| Satisfaction Ratings | |
| Room Quality: | Average |
| On-Site Dining: | |
| Facility Quality: | |
| Activities: | |
| Entertainment: | |
| Quality of Service: | Average |
| Descriptive Property Review | |
|
Reviewed by Bob L. of chicago, il usa on Feb-2008 Stayed at the Property - Feb-2008 I only stayed for one night. Just in and out. Barely time to form and informed opinion. |
|
| Pros: | pleasant |
| Cons: | nothing really |
| Recommended For: | Business Seniors Singles |
| Descriptive Property Review | |
|
Reviewed by Connie H. of on Mar-2007 Stayed at the Property - Mar-2007 Check in was not accomodating. Asked for roll away bed - delivered to room but not set up. Dirty coffee pot with used filter and bathroom garbage left. Not worth the money for this room. |
|
| Pros: | location |
| Cons: | service |
| Recommended For: | |
| Descriptive Property Review | |
|
Reviewed by Chuck W. of PA USA on Sep-2006 Stayed at the Property - Sep-2006 not a bad place to stay; location was convenient |
|
| Pros: | location |
| Cons: | time of houskeeping |
| Recommended For: | |
| Satisfaction Ratings | |
| Room Quality: | |
| On-Site Dining: | |
| Facility Quality: | |
| Activities: | |
| Entertainment: | |
| Quality of Service: | |
| Descriptive Property Review | |
|
Reviewed by Connie H. of on Mar-2007 Stayed at the Property - Mar-2007 Check in was not accomodating. Asked for roll away bed - delivered to room but not set up. Dirty coffee pot with used filter and bathroom garbage left. Not worth the money for this room. |
|
| Pros: | location |
| Cons: | service |
| Recommended For: | |
| Descriptive Property Review | |
|
Reviewed by Chuck W. of PA USA on Sep-2006 Stayed at the Property - Sep-2006 not a bad place to stay; location was convenient |
|
| Pros: | location |
| Cons: | time of houskeeping |
| Recommended For: | |
| Satisfaction Ratings | |
| Room Quality: | |
| On-Site Dining: | |
| Facility Quality: | |
| Activities: | |
| Entertainment: | |
| Quality of Service: | |
| Descriptive Property Review | |
|
Reviewed by Chuck W. of PA USA on Sep-2006 Stayed at the Property - Sep-2006 not a bad place to stay; location was convenient |
|
| Pros: | location |
| Cons: | time of houskeeping |
| Recommended For: | |